Category Archives: Uncategorized

May 20 Update – Markets enter “Bear” territory

 

Hello Folks

As the week wraps up, the indexes unfortunately had a very bad performance, with the NASDAQ now officially in “Bear Market” territory, and the S&P 500 having briefly entered it today (however it recovered back above it later in the day).

Inflation and rising interest rates appear to be the primary threats for the stock market.   Currently, the FOMC team appears to want to raise rates “as fast as possible” per this podcast here:  https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/feds-barkin-wants-to-hike-as-fast-as-feasible/id1623606106?i=1000560528697

The academic theory behind this is that when inflation is too high, the Federal Reserve typically raises interest rates to slow the economy and bring inflation down. When inflation is too low, the Federal Reserve typically lowers interest rates to stimulate the economy and move inflation higher.

In the meantime, stocks take a hit, however the Federal Reserve is not really concerned about the stock market, that is not in its wheelhouse (making your 401k or TSP go up or down): https://www.cnbc.com/2022/05/19/fed-isnt-focused-on-impact-of-rates-on-stocks-esther-george-says.html

Stocks typically LEAD (not lag) economic indicators, an “official” recession is declared (officially) only by the National Bureau of Economic Research, via the Business Cycle Dating Committee (BCDC); any such declaration will be made long after it the recession starts:

Indeed, you will likely see economists from large firms such as Bank of America, JP Morgan, come out with their own assessments of a recession, the important thing to note is 1) the stock market LEADS, and 2) most recession declarations are made post-incident, after we are in it.

What does that mean for the TSP ?   Well since it is the government’s version of a 401(k), it means the stock funds will likely go lower, versus higher.   How you manage your investment decisions is up to you, I merely share things how I see them.   However before you jump to F-fund (Bonds), consider the below May 3, 2022 interview (at time stamp 4:07) with billionaire hedge fund manager Paul Tudor Jones:

YouTube Preview Image

In his opinion, the world should neither be in stocks, nor bonds.   In TSP land, what does that leave?  The only option, is the G-Fund.   Not that I have ever talked about G-Fund, ever, on this site.   No, the paltry +.65% G-Fund return year to date is not keeping up with inflation.  However if +.65% is not, I can guarantee you that the negative -18% in the S-Fund for sure is not keeping up with inflation.  Just thinking out-loud with my personal opinion…consult your professional advisors and do your own research in regards to how much risk and what rates of return are appropriate for your personal situation.

That is all I have for now.  Unfortunately not the best of news this week.  Maybe the stock markets see this post and reverse course next week, and gas prices go to $1 a gallon.  Well, wishful thinking.    I will be monitoring things.  For now have a good weekend.

Note:   Some email programs have been blocking the images in my posts, if this happens please just click on this link to be taken directly to the website itself:   http://www.thefedtrader.com/

-Bill Pritchard

 

 

Long Awaited Market Update

 

Hello Subscribers

Well here is your long awaited opinion-based market update.  It is interesting how retirement, and a “second life” / new career, will occupy your time… retirement should be about slowing down (in theory) however ever since I have retired and started my new job (as the rookie new guy all over again….), I have been in some stage of training, probationary “sign off status”, more training, and trying to keep the axe sharp just doing my daily routine stuff at the new job.  Which means I am reviewing, studying, etc even on my days off.   My activity on this site has waned, and I apologize.  I also had a recent adventure called a root canal, not sure which was more painful, the procedure or dealing with my insurance/dentist- I didn’t know you needed a PhD in Forensic Accounting (where is @Chris Barfield) to understand the billing system in the back office of the dentist office.   I digress…

Flash forward to the markets.  BLUF:  My opinion is 100% G-Fund, or 75% G-Fund and 25% C-Fund (if you insist on “some” stock exposure), is the ideal balance for the conditions we are in.  The G-Fund haters will throw darts at my picture…I get it, saying they relish the opportunity to “buy cheap” (sadly, things may get “cheaper”), however this retired guy does not want to watch his TSP balance vaporize, I am personally 100% G-Fund right now.   If you are 25 years old, with 40 years of service ahead of you, your view of things is likely different.  Go forth young Jedi.  “It is different this time” and “Pritchard is overly conservative” etc etc.   I get it.  Again, for me, I am 100% G-Fund.

Allow me to point out some prior posts, let’s put this in the category of “The Fed Trader website called it correctly [again]”

Nov 28:  “Trouble Ahead”

Dec 20:  “Market Deterioration Continues”

In regards to the market’s problems that I commented on back in November and December, note that an open source search of various news and financial sites, November and December, will depict numerous “this is just a hiccup” and “temporary speed-bump” kinds of posts; I of course, felt otherwise and posted what I posted.  How did things turn out?  Lets look at the S&P 500 chart:

Indeed, things started to break down in late 2021.  Most of this is tied to inflation.   The S&P 500 is approaching its “official Bear” level of 3854.90, a 20% decline from its peak.

Rhetorical question:  did everyone enjoy their 42% pay raise they received in the last 12 months?  Has anyone topped their car off, walked in the grocery store, and walked out wondering “where is it all going” ?   Read further.

You didn’t get that raise?   Well, neither did I, however this explains the pain we are all witnessing at the gas pumps, in merely a year, the average price of gas has increased approximately 42%.  Other things have gone up too: housing (and property taxes), food, and vehicle prices have all gone up.  Since most of America did not get a 42% raise, they are faced with a few choices, namely, put it on a credit card (per this link, this is happening now), or dial back spending.   As many dial back spending, this trickles down into various sectors of the economy, which causes companies to report less than stellar earnings.  When major companies have supply chain issues, increased fuel and logistics costs, and other challenges, this too impacts the bottom line, which can push their stocks downward.  Most companies will “pass this [rising costs] on” to the consumer, who must then decide if spending $100 to fill up the SUV to drive the kids to the amusement park is worth it.  Thinking about the new Iphone 14 Pro?   Or is your Iphone 12 camera quite fine for taking pictures of your dog sleeping on the floor?  Do you have both Amazon Prime and NetFlix?   CostCo and Sams Club? Some may decide that just one is enough.

Lets look at some more charts:

As seen above, the Consumer Price Index (CPI), a measure of inflation, is at levels not witnessed before in 20 years.  The CPI measures the average change in prices over time that consumers pay for a basket of goods and services.  The consumer (you and I) is being squeezed.  As inflation rises, the Federal Reserve attempts to dampen spending and “slow the economy” by raising interest rates.   See the below chart of the average rate, now at 5.27%, of the 30-year mortgage:

So, in basically all aspects of daily life, inflation is impacting everybody.  With that said, it will probably get worse before it gets better (just my opinion).   The summer travel season will be a telling indicator on whether consumer spending behavior will slow.  COVID restrictions are removed in most places, masks are not required for air travel, and America is ready for some rest and recreation.   Unfortunately it will be more expensive to do so.  The next few months will be interesting.

As stated above, my personal TSP is 100% G-Fund.   This concludes my opinion-based assessment of the markets, I promise to make an effort to post more frequently.   Thank you for being a subscriber, if you feel that this site has been beneficial, please recommend your friends and colleagues to become subscribers.

Thank you

-Bill Pritchard

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NASDAQ and S&P 500 begin downtrend

 

Hello to all the subscribers and Happy (belated) New Year.   I waited until now for this post, desiring to let the first two weeks of January come and go, with some market messaging hopefully obtained by now.   Let’s talk about the continued lethargy on the indexes and the challenges which appear to exist in the near term.

Shortly after my previous post (on December 20), the markets indeed rallied, but this was on very low volume.  I have stated numerous times on this site that volume is the “horsepower” behind the corresponding move, a move up with strong volume reflects a high probability that the move will continue.  A move up on low volume, not so much.    See chart of the S&P 500 index:

As we can see, the low volume coincides with the Christmas and New Year holiday time frame.   Once “Wall Street came back” from the holidays, the first week of January, the index went lower each day of the first trading week of the year, on above average volume.  It then recovered slightly, likely due to bargain hunters “buying low” but then deteriorated a few days again.   As of Jan 14, the index is basically in the same position as it was in November and December.

The tech heavy NASDAQ, also the location of many S-Fund / small cap companies, is performing even worse, having broken thru its 50-day and 200-day Moving Averages:

While the above performance does not mean it is time to panic, it is clearly undesirable and especially so, in light of the fact that trading during the first week of the calendar year historically “sets the tone” for the rest of the year.

What is causing this to happen?  As stated in my December 20 post, the concerns appear to be inflation, and COVID (Omicron variant).  Please do not interpret my musings about the markets as a political position, I seek to provide my opinion of why the market’s are not performing well, and nothing more.  With that said, inflation data, per two key indicators, known as the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE), is at historical all time highs.   I spoke about inflation and interest rate hikes in 2015, at this March 11, 2015 post: http://www.thefedtrader.com/march-11-update-all-about-rate-hikes/

I will not regurgitate what I said in that post, so lets post some visual depictions of just how high inflation has gone up:

CPI and PCE are basically measuring the same thing, albeit with a slightly different formula.  The “Core” data is the measurement not including food and energy (gasoline, etc.), since food and energy can be very volatile and very supply chain dependent.  Core data above reflects rising inflation, at levels never seen before.   This inflation began to rise, per the charts, both in early 2021.   The markets digested it fairly well, in 2021, because no other headwinds really existed. 

Flash forward to late 2021, and we have two things:  1) Inflation has no longer “begun to rise” like it was labeled in early 2021, it clearly is at excessive levels, and 2) COVID via the omicron variant is a new threat to the economy.   We have talked about inflation, lets move to COVID, with charts of CDC reported deaths, and of COVID related ICU admissions.

In my opinion, “new cases” is a worthless (or almost worthless) data point, as some people get COVID and recover quickly, others may test positive but they never had any symptoms, and other reasons.  A direct link to “new cases” and “negative impact to the economy” would be a big leap.   However, again, and let me emphasize this is my opinion, the best way to assess COVID’s impact is COVID death counts, and COVID ICU admissions.   Is it a perfect way?  Is it flawless?   No.   But I think it is the best way (or least worse of all the ways).

Unfortunately, if you are to believe the charts, both ICU admissions and death counts are headed up, not down.  As big employers face OSHA mandates and compliance with “best practices”, the return to the office for corporate America is again in question, business travel, hotel occupancy rates face impact, and other things can be affected.  Indeed, the Omicron variant appears to be “less severe” but staffing shortages are causing schools, airlines, and some restaurants to cancel operations.

An ongoing research study by the University of Texas forecasts that in late January 2022, COVID patients in ICU’s will exceed all previous highs since 2020:

In sum, are major funds on Wall Street, with billions under management, and teams of mathematicians, analysts, and researchers on staff, not watching this?  Of course they are.  And it would be wise that the individual investor be aware of these challenges also.

With that said, a conservative-leaning approach to the TSP would be sound, in my opinion.   I have stated that 75% G-Fund and 25% C-Fund is arguably the ideal allocation for most investors at the present time.   I personally would probably not be 100% I-fund or 100% S-Fund or anything considered aggressive.   At the risk of somebody claiming the Fed Trader is too conservative, I indeed embrace that stance, especially for the retirees.  If you have been 100% S-Fund all 2021 and are thinking about reducing to a more conservative stance, then yes, now is probably the time to do it.  

Standard disclaimer:  How you manage your TSP is up to you.

With that said, my risk-adverse self is signing out for now.   Let’s monitor the inflation, and COVID situation, and hope both stop their climbs.

Hope everyone has a great week, and talk to you soon.

-Bill Pritchard

 

 

 

 

 

Market deterioration continues…

Good Morning Folks

Unfortunately, the markets continue to deteriorate, with (as stated in my prior post) the Omicron “new variant” and inflation taking center stage.   This morning (Monday Dec-20), the Dow Jones Index is 600 points down, and the S&P 500 has “gapped down” on above average volume.

As you can see in this graphic, the “support level” for the S&P 500 is 4500, while the “overhead resistance” level is at 4725.    The common definition of a “bear market” is when an index declines 20% or more from it’s peak price, so the following levels below (rounded) are important to watch.  Often, once a market enters “bear territory”, additional investors throw in the towel and exit positions, further exasperating the situation…

Dow Jones:   Peak:   36,566.  Bear Level:  29,253

S&P 500:  Peak:  4,744.  Bear Level:  3,795

NASDAQ:  Peak:  16,212.   Bear Level:  12,970

Some additional indicators exist which I monitor daily, however a 20% decline from the peak is a widely accepted rule of thumb for a bear market.   Thankfully, we are not close yet but it is important to be aware of.   Whether you should be “safe” in G-Fund (per the TSP website, indeed an “investment”), or “buying cheap” in the stock funds, as they crash, is a discussion between you and you, my prior posts over the last ten years will reveal my personal opinion on that topic, I plan to cease regurgitating that topic anymore as strong opinions exist on both sides (which I respect).

To reiterate, the Omicron variant, and inflation (more Omicron in my opinion…) is spooking the markets.   This was discussed in my November 28 post (South Africa reported Omicron to the WHO on Nov 24), and, well, here we are today three weeks later, with markets crashing.

I personally am optimistic regarding our economy and resilience in the face of these virus concerns, however indeed at the end of the day, the markets do not care what you, or I, think.  They will do what they do.   A positive observation I have is that South Africa has a huge case uptick but the death rates have not increased, at least not yet, and we are 3+ weeks into the new variant:

https://covid19.who.int/region/afro/country/za

https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/coronavirus-data-explorer?zoomToSelection=true&time=2020-03-01..latest&uniformYAxis=0&pickerSort=asc&pickerMetric=location&Metric=Cases+and+deaths&Interval=7-day+rolling+average&Relative+to+Population=true&Align+outbreaks=false&country=~ZAF

So maybe, just maybe, this new variant, indeed highly contagious, has no severe impact to the victim.  If this proves to be correct, the markets should respond accordingly and come back strong.   “We should know something” by late January, which is two months after the discovery of the initial case.    Back to G-Fund, should you bail out now before the eye of the hurricane hits ?  Or should you wait, with the expectation that things will improve?   Again, that is between you and you (and your professional advisors).

With that said, today is December 20, so allow me to say “Merry Christmas” to all my subscribers and followers.    I wish you a safe and joyful holiday !  I will probably post again after the holidays.

-Bill Pritchard

 

 

 

Post-Thanksgiving Update – Trouble Ahead ?

Good Evening everybody

How time flies, my last post was in July.    As you may know, I have retired from the DEA.  Let’s talk about the markets and recent developments, namely “the new COVID variant” (grumble grumble).

Looking backward, at the last six months, the C-Fund has outperformed all the other funds, with the S-Fund taking second place, up until about a month ago, when the I-Fund outperformed S-Fund.   Enter the “new COVID variant” which was reported to the World Health Organization by the South African health authorities on November 24, which triggered a market sell off on Friday Nov 26.

Presently, my crystal ball tells me that the funds most susceptible to damage from a sell-off will be the I-Fund, then S-Fund, then C-Fund.   I-Fund due to international exposure, S-Fund due to smaller-sized companies and inabilities to sustain economic damage, and lastly C-Fund, all super large companies with ostensibly some protection from short term “new COVID variant” damage.  Clear as mud?   Basically, in my OPINION, if you are 100% I-Fund, you might consult your professional advisors and/or make your own educated decision for your own account and consider reducing some I-Fund exposure.   My OPINION is that (especially for the retired…) a balance of 25% C-Fund (see above comment regarding protection from damage) and 75% G-Fund, the same allocation I discussed in my July post, is still a sensible allocation, again, in my opinion.     

Lets take a look at the original 2020 COVID crash:

As you can see, the market began to deteriorate on February 24, 2020, and began to recover on March 23, 2020, or almost a month later.   What will happen this time?  Who knows, that is anybody’s guess.  However one observation I have is that the stock market, and the economy, in early 2020, both were at all time highs, and rather healthy.  Then COVID came along, and indeed caused havoc.   Presently, now, today, the economy has some other concerns, most notably inflation, and some areas have still not healed from COVID-2020, such as the supply chain (chips for new cars, etc.).   Frankly, the “new variant” is the last thing we need, just when things had started to recover.  I am not fear mongering but just calling it how I see it.  Also important to note is the development of vaccines, which may mitigate impact of this new variant.  As of the publication of this post, the “new variant” (being now called Omicron) has yet to be found in the USA.

Moving on, lets answer if the sell off is “real” or just panic.   Well, any sell off is real, but lets dive deeper behind the scenes, and try to determine if this is the start of a new downtrend or not.  Disclaimer, this is somewhat crystal-ballish, but lets do it anyway.  Keep in mind that Friday was the day after Thanksgiving, historically a day when most market participants are away from keyboards and their Bloomberg terminals.  Friday was also the worst performing day of the year for the Dow Jones index.

Using the Exchange Traded Funds of SPY to monitor C-Fund, and IWM to monitor S-Fund, both witnessed trading volume of 70-90% above their average volumes.   Additionally, Gold traded higher on Friday, indicating a flight to safety.   So how will Monday November 29, and subsequent days, react?   Again, that is a crystal ball but if more negative news develops on the new COVID variant, I believe the markets may continue down.    As seen below, the volume on Friday for the SPY ETF indeed was much higher than average.

The coming days will likely determine which direction the market will go next.  Hopefully Friday’s panic does not continue.   Dow Jones futures for the evening of Sunday Nov 28 are reflect them trading up almost 250 points:

As stated before, my opinion is that 75% G-Fund, 25% C-Fund represents a good allocation in light of ongoing inflationary and COVID concerns.   My opinion is heavy I-Fund exposure may result in undesirable negative impact from any “new variant” COVID concerns.

Additional comment:  I have received some questions about “market timing” and why not just “buy and hold.”  I respect everyone’s opinion, however instead of typing out a response, allow me to direct you to a 2019 post addressing this topic, at this link:  http://www.thefedtrader.com/positive-signs-continue-for-the-markets/

Begin reading about halfway down the post in which I discuss market timing, the G-Fund, and the fact that the TSP website itself (not me…) advocates the use of the G-Fund to protect against losses.    To quote from the US government TSP website:  Consider investing in the G Fund if you would like to have all or a portion of your TSP account completely protected from loss. 

Interestingly, one website existed, of course with no obvious ownership identity or human name behind it, let’s just say the word “allocation” was in the website name, well that website is no longer working and the last update prior to going out of service was sometime in 2019.   Be careful who you listen to folks.   The only people I personally would follow for TSP commentary would be me, Dan Jamison, and Chris Barfield.   All “real humans” and actual participants in the TSP system, with “real skin” in the game.  I am not a CPA, have no planning or tax expertise (nor claim to have it) so you will not find that here.  My passion is market analysis.   With over 7,000+ mutual funds in existence, per Money Magazine , indeed there are a variety of ways to pursue investment returns and analyze the market’s moves.  Some are better than others, some are worse than others.   For every guy that tells me “gee, I could have made more money by not being in G-Fund” is a guy who says “golly jeepers, I sure feel safe in G-Fund.”  What you see here is my method.  If you find it useful or informative, please share this website with your friends and colleagues.

Thanks for reading and talk to you soon….

Bill Pritchard

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Market Update: Threats ahead? and TSP change

 

A somewhat overdue update…

Good Evening to everybody and Hello from “retirement-land,” an odd and chaos-free world, where you no longer carry a work cell phone, you don’t have to put in a leave slip anymore, and you are not constantly deleting emails because somebody sent a global world-wide distribution (with a red exclamation mark) that some office has a FAX-line out of service.

I highly recommend entering this world, as soon as you can.

With that said, it is time for an update from your favorite opinion based TSP and stock market analysis site, aka The Fed Trader.  The last few months (sans AL-slip, and free of mandatory HQ travel notifications), have been spent white-water rafting and hiking in Colorado, then at a beach in Mexico, somewhere else watching a professional soccer game, and other fun stuff.   Updates have been sporadic I know but please don’t beat me up too badly.  However, some things indeed are brewing on the horizon so it is time for an update.   In the last few months, honestly, no earth shattering single-issue news has hit, and I have thus not reported on much, however a combination of things is brewing right now which may, or may not (“opinion based”), impact the markets and subsequently your TSP performance.  Pleasant cheerful reminder that I do not give investment advice and how you manage your TSP is up to you.  Also, this is not a political site and I try to post factual information and data, in almost all cases developed via my own analysis.  At times the data and information may have an [INSERT PARTY]-lean to it, trust me, it is not designed that way.   Moving forward…

My opinion right now is we have two threats ahead, notably Inflation and the COVID Resurgeor potential panic-attacks because of a perceived resurge.

Lets first, before we start, look at the stock market itself.   Why?  Because at the end of the day, it does not matter what a bunch of market analysts, economists, me, or investment advisors think, it just matters what the market does.   So what is it doing?

If we look back 30 to 90 days, my typical investing horizon (apparently my typical website-update horizon too), we will see that the C-Fund is performing best, or “least worst” of all the funds.  We will also see that the S-Fund is getting clobbered recently, as various NASDAQ stocks and small company stocks start to feel what many believe to be pains associated to inflation, supply chain (planes, trains, automobiles), and supply shortages themselves (lumber, computer chips, etc.).  Large super sized companies, the Microsofts and General Electrics of the world, can tolerate some of those things a little better than the smaller companies.

Lets look at a chart of the SPY exchange-traded-fund, a proxy for the S&P 500:

As can be seen, the SPY ETF remains in an uptrend, however it saw some selling/distribution back in March, then in May, then in June.  It remains above its 50 day Moving Average, and technically is still in an uptrend.  However I would have preferred to not see the selling/distribution in recent months.

Lets talk about the “threats” as I see them.   First, inflation.  Two different price indexes are popular for measuring inflation: the consumer price index (CPI) from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the personal consumption expenditures price index (PCE) from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Each of these is constructed for different groups of goods and services, most notably a headline (or overall) measure and a core (which excludes food and energy prices) measure.  It should be noted that the Federal Reserve uses the PCE index as a tool when making monetary policy decisions.

The Consumer Price Index (CPI), which is a measure of the average change over time in the prices paid by urban consumers for a market basket of consumer goods and services.  The CPI reflects the largest increase in consumer inflation since 2008 (we all know what happened that year…the housing crash….).

PCE Inflation shows a similar trend, well, inflation is indeed here, again, at all time highs in over ten years.

At some point, all this self-corrects.  Consumers decide that their incomes did not go up 25% this year, so they cannot afford the gas that has doubled, or the steak dinner that tripled, and stop spending.   Note:  Gas prices are up 45% since summer 2020:

Did you get a 45% raise?  Probably not, and this is a simplified demonstration of inflation.   Goods start to cost more than people can afford.  Like I said, at some point it self-corrects.

The final threat, in my eyes, is the perceived (but sure looks real-to-me), COVID resurge, notably the Delta variant.  My uneducated research reveals that the majority of the newly infected are either not-vaccinated people, or unfortunate others in 3rd world countries who received various Russian and Chinese vaccines with reduced efficacies.  They are “vaccinated”, masks come off, and back to regular business.  However infections start soon thereafter.

Looking at “body counts” and “deaths”, the following charts appear to reflect a reversal of the COVID death trend:

The good news, is INSIDE America, COVID seems to be “under control”, the economy is coming back, and summer travel is booming.  But this can be subject to change with the Delta variant, reportedly more contagious than other strains, and also the now dominant strain in the US.

So there you have it folks, “things as I see them.”  Note, due to my retired status, I am very risk-averse with my TSP and as such, have changed things to 75% G-Fund, 25% C-Fund.  Before all the Kevins and Karens cry or post on LinkedIn that I am too conservative and use the G-Fund too much, the above allocation is basically the same as the L-Fund.   Yes, Wall Street fund managers want you to NOT SELL your investments when times get rough, those managers get paid for assets under management (AUM).  “Hang in there Mr Investor” / “Think about the long haul” / etc.  Furthermore, yes, the G-Fund can be part of your road to wealth, albeit slower, per this June 15, 2021 article in Federal News Network:

https://federalnewsnetwork.com/mike-causey-federal-report/2021/06/wanna-join-the-tsp-millionaires-club-ask-one/

Quote:  “……Many years ago, I spent lunches with co-workers, and we would discuss the TSP and where everyone planned to invest their accounts. Back in those days, our only options were just the G, C, F, and I Funds, a small fraction of current TSP funds. Many believed the economy looked promising and spoke about investing aggressively in the C fund. Others chose a more cautious path by not taking any chances and investing 100% of their account in the G fund. In my opinion, both paths of investing — whether aggressive or cautious — can lead to success; you just need to make the choice that will let you sleep at night……”

Wow, powerful.  “Let you sleep at night.”  I have only said that a zillion times on this site.   Glad to see this concept supported over at Federal News Network.  Remember, the TSP official website itself, states that investors should consider investing in the G Fund if you would like to have all or a portion of your TSP account completely protected from loss.  That is not from me, that is from the TSP.   I didn’t “invent” the concept of moving to G-Fund to be protected from loss. 

Summary:

1.  Some threats exist, Inflation and COVID, on the path ahead.

2.  For my personal risk tolerance and ability to sleep at night, I will be changing to 75% G-Fund, 25% C-Fund.

Hope you enjoyed this update, if you feel it is useful please share it with friends and coworkers.  A few TSP analysis sites have come and gone over the years (all claiming to be a “different approach”) but this one remains strong, with continued subscriber growth each month and multi-thousands of subscribers from every federal agency under the moon.  Thank you !

Talk to you soon….

-Bill Pritchard

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March kicks off with turbulence…

 

Good Evening everyone

The first trading week of March is now behind us, and it has been quite a week.  Please bear with me as I share my opinions and my assessment of recent market activity.  My personal TSP Allocation of 100% S-Fund has not changed.  Why not?  I am not a TSP day trader, and instead prefer a long term view of the funds.  A variety of theories, strategies, beliefs, etc. exist out there (just Google search “TSP”) regarding the best way to manage your TSP- just do what works for you.  “Works for you” may mean absolute total returns, it can also mean “be able to sleep at night”, or a combination of the two.  8,000 mutual funds exist in the USA, how many ways exist to invest in stocks?  8,000?  Not sure, but apparently it is a big business if 8,000 funds exist.  Ok, enough soap-boxing, lets move on to what I think is happening in the markets.

Interestingly, the first day of March 2021 was the best S&P 500 day since June 2020.  This was a great way to kick the month off, a month that historically has given us good performance as shown by the below graphic:

Less than desirable however, was the subsequent “mini crash” the various indexes had after March 1, arguably fueled by the rise in 10-year Treasury Yields which many believe is associated to risk of rising inflation.  (Note:  the Dow Jones finished Friday 572 points up for that day…..)

This subsequently causes a fear that the Federal Reserve may change monetary policy and thus some nervousness enters the markets.  However, I am not personally getting too wrapped around the axle about Treasury Yields, not yet, because my other “indicators” (that is checkpoint-speak) show (relatively) smooth roads ahead.  What are these?  They are gold, crude oil, and the overall trend of the indexes.   Lets look at gold, the default safe-haven investment.

As can be seen in the chart, investors are not suddenly flocking to Gold, because “the markets are tanking.”  Gold is down hard, reflecting outpouring of investment.

Lets take a look at Crude Oil, which has seen a spectacular rise in recent months, great news for the oil industry.  I have spoken about this before; many believe rising Crude Oil prices reflect a strengthening economy,  and Crude Oil is increasing rapidly:

 

The price climb is obvious on the above charts, a climb which began in November 2020.  I recently spoke with a friend from West Texas, an owner of an oil service company, he reports that the industry expects a very positive 2021.  This is further supported by this article:  https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Why-Big-Oil-Expects-Record-Cash-Flow-In-2021.html

So we have two fairly reliable (in my opinion) indicators which seem to paint a positive picture.  That leaves us with the S&P 500 index itself:

While this week has been volatile, the overall uptrend is still intact.  The index has only closed below its 50-day moving average once, and that was on March 4.  Indeed volume has increased on the “down” days, but we have seen some positive volume on the “up” days also.

With that, I conclude this update.  Again, my TSP Allocation has not changed.

I hope everyone is doing well and for those traveling or vacationing on Spring Break in the coming weeks, have a safe vacation.   Also, please continue to share this site with your friends and colleagues.  For those who need benefits and retirement program information, beyond market/TSP analysis, always keep in mind Dan Jamison, who authors the FERS Guide book.

Thank you and talk to you soon….

-Bill Pritchard

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

February 1, 2021 Update

Hello Folks

The new year is off to quite a start. This includes my own recent retirement from the federal government, under the FERS “25 years of 6(c) = retire at any age” provision. It was truly the best career in the world, with awesome coworkers and colleagues from other agencies and departments. Old habits will die hard…I am not sure if I will ever stop checking my phone for “missed calls” (nobody called…) or if I will be able to change the way I speak, asking my wife “what is the status of the soccer game” or “are you enroute back home” or “what is the game-plan for tomorrow” type of stuff.  Picking up our kid from track?  “Who is transporting” or (alternatively) “who is covering the pickup of….” etc.  I know, crazy.  “Would you like dessert sir?”  Negative.   It will be hard to de-1811ize myself, after all these years.  With that said, I hope to have much more time for this website, and I have some other ideas and projects being contemplated regarding investment education and market analysis. Stay tuned.

Moving onward, time to talk about the markets and the TSP. Back in mid-December, I posted the below regarding small cap stocks:

My point above was that the S-Fund was probably the best place to be for the time being, in my opinion.  Not shockingly, recent returns published on the TSP website reflect that out of fifteen fund choices, the S-Fund has been the top performer Year-To-Date for 2021.  Link:    https://www.tsp.gov/fund-performance/

Note that in my opinion, this will likely continue, and my personal TSP allocation is indeed 100% S-Fund.  I do not advocate day trading your TSP, and instead I seek to capture long term trends.  As many know, I am not afraid to use the ultra conservative G-Fund as a tool in my toolbox, even if it means foregoing gains in a riskier investment.  Presently, it is my opinion that being fully invested in the S-Fund, or a combination of S, C, and I  Funds, is something for the TSP investor to consider and research.  My own analysis of the various funds and index performance indicates that small cap and international stocks may outperform other categories in the next three to six months.  As outlined in FAQ #6, a new President (any party) can serve as a catalyst for a new Bull market.  Let’s take a look at a chart of the SPY Exchange Traded Fund, a useful proxy of the S&P 500 index:

As can be seen, this ETF, and the S&P 500 itself, has rallied since November.   Moving past this, a look at the weekly price of Gold reflects that investors are leaving Gold (a “safe haven” investment), which would seem to reinforce my theory that stocks are taking on a new Bull posture:

As I have stated in numerous prior posts, Crude Oil is a barometer of the economy, being a supply/demand product, many believe that low crude oil prices are indicative of poor economic conditions.   A check of the Crude Oil chart reveals a price uptrend since November 2020:

Additionally, another tool I use for a fundamental analysis of the economy is the Chicago “Business Barometer”, an index which measures manufacturing in the Midwest USA.  Values above 50 indicate growth of manufacturing activity.  The recent January 2021 release, comes in at 63.8, the highest reading since July 2018.  See image:

It is not my goal to bury the reader in charts and graphics, so in sum, my opinion is the stock market may see a new Bull movement, and go higher, in 2021.   My opinion is that the S-Fund will be the best performer, with the I-Fund and C-Fund, being second and third choices, for the near future.

With that said, what do you think the stock market will do in 2021 ?  I am interested to see what the audience thinks.  Please complete this poll (link below), which includes a comment feature if you are a Facebook user:

POLL: https://linkto.run/p/WZCV0DOK

Thank you for being a subscriber, if you find this post informative or useful, please encourage your friends and colleagues to subscribe.

-Bill Pritchard

 

 

Market Analysis – Dec 12, 2020

 

Good Morning folks, I hope this update finds everyone well.  Now that we have the Presidential election behind us, let’s take a look at the markets and surrounding events.   Bottom Line Up Front:   The S&P 500 has risen 9.64% since November 2 (the day before the election), and small cap stocks appear to be the best performing category for the time being.

As many know, a few major events have occurred since the election, which is important because elections are major catalysts which influence the markets (see FAQ# 6):   The US Supreme Court recently denied a Texas lawsuit seeking to overturn the vote in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia and Wisconsin.  Additionally, President Trump signed a stopgap funding bill keeping the federal government open until December 18, and the FDA approved Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.

As stated above, the markets have rallied since the election.  “Why” is a complicated question, however in a very general sense, the markets do not like uncertainty or unknowns.  Let’s take a look at the S&P 500 chart:

On November 2 (the day before the election) the index closed at 3310.24.   Since then, it has risen 9.64%, a respectable number given the fact that it represents approximately one month of days that the markets were open.   The energy and oil sector, an important jobs creator in Texas (and other areas), has witnessed oil prices subsequently rise, as demonstrated by the below Crude Oil and Energy Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) charts below:

I have posted previously on this site that a desirable price per barrel for Crude Oil is $55.   With the current price above $45, we are making some progress towards that desired level, which results in profits for our large oil companies (and jobs), and still keeps the price at the retail gas pump at a level affordable to the consumer.

The energy sector ETF, ticker symbol “XLE”, has risen also, propelled by oil prices and optimism in the energy sector.  Note that oil prices tend to rise in good economic conditions, and tend to fall when the economy is faltering.  Rising prices arguably may be a harbinger of things ahead.

Since the election, small cap stocks have outperformed all others.   Investment in small cap stocks is done via the S-Fund in the Thrift Savings Plan.  The TSP investor may desire to research this further and use that information as he makes his own investment decisions.   On a 30-day thru 90-day basis, the small caps are strongly outperforming the large cap (C-Fund) and international stocks (I-Fund), some weighting in the C-Fund might be a consideration for further research.

With the FDA vaccine authorization (and other countries also authorizing vaccines), this should further help the economy.   Current death rates from COVID, using CDC data, are approaching April 2020 rates:

Airlines, restaurants, in-person retail, hopefully will see a rebound once vaccines are widely available.  Not suffering is E-Commerce, as consumers order online and have everything shipped to their house.  E-Commerce was booming before COVID, now it is on fire; as it solves a problem and makes life easier for millions of people.  In summary, if you have a smartphone, you have a shopping mall, a grocery store, and a movie theater, all in your hand.  Pretty powerful stuff, the future of which is basically unlimited, in my opinion.

Regarding the federal budget, this is a huge unknown, however my opinion is the stopgap funding until December 18 will then expire and the government may see a shutdown after that.   Hopefully Congress can agree on the COVID stimulus package prior to that.  Again, my opinion, but the way I see this, the one week stopgap funding gets the federal workforce a full pay period “worked”, which will get the workforce paid for Christmas (EFT on/about Dec 24).   However after December 18, we have Congress who may wish to go home for Christmas break, and the fact that the “new” Congress takes effect on January 3, 2021 may also complicate things.   The January 20, 2021 inauguration is fast approaching also.  I guess my point/opinion is we have a lot of stuff going on ahead, and I am not sure if a shutdown can be averted.  My prediction (hope I am wrong):  We shut down on Dec 19 thru ??? possibly January 3, 2021.

This concludes my current assessment of the markets.  I hope everybody has a great weekend and is healthy and strong, as we wrap up a challenging year.

Please continue to share this website and email updates with friends and colleagues.  They can subscribe via this link:  http://www.thefedtrader.com/contact-us/

Thank you

-Bill Pritchard

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Election 2020 market update

 

Good Evening Folks

Well here we are.  Arguably one of the most watched elections in recent history, and with record voter turnout.  Let’s talk about what has happened and what the markets have been doing.

First, the Dow Jones “overnight futures markets” the night prior to the election (November 2) traded up, ranging from 150 to 200 points.  This continued into the regular stock market trading day of November 3, with the Dow Jones reaching 600 points to the positive during the morning.  This is a welcome change from the prior week, as it signals the week starting on positive footing.  Please see below S&P 500 chart of the recent roller coaster we have been on:

Tuesday’s action witnessed the Dow having the best trading day since July 14.  This action follows Monday November 2, which was also a strong up day.  On both days, volume was above average, indicating accumulation, or buying of equities by institutional investors.   Please see below chart of the SPY Exchange Traded Fund (ETF):

The day after the election, Wednesday November 4, witnessed the Dow Jones index trading 600 points to the positive.  The I-Fund, interestingly, ended the week as the top performer.  In addition to US markets, stocks in France and Germany also rallied.

Not to be outdone by equities markets, Crude Oil futures also traded higher, rising to $39 a barrel.  Note that crude oil typically behaves in unison with equities.

I have posted on this site before the fact that the markets typically outperform under a Democrat as President.  This is factually correct, however this should be clarified that the best performance is when a Democrat is President, with Congress under Republican control.  The market seems to prefer a checks-and-balance mechanism.  I am not advocating for one party or another (and the stock market is just one part of the universe, which must include law and order and a strong military), nor am I telling you who to vote for in the now-past election.  I am merely posting historical market facts.  See chart:

All of the recent action has been on above average volume, with the QQQ and SPY ETF’s gapping up.  This is a very bullish behavior, and is further explained at this link:  https://www.investors.com/how-to-invest/investors-corner/breakaway-gap-the-art-of-the-breakout/

The solid performance continued into November 5, with the Dow Jones going up 600 points.  That day, the tech heavy NASDAQ had its best 3-day run since April.

On Friday November 6, the markets “sold off” somewhat but this is reasonable to expect as most Fridays witness sell offs prior the weekends.  Combine this with the huge run up during the week- it is normal for folks to take some winnings off the table.

Now that we know what happened with the markets, what do I expect to happen with the election?  Let’s use parties, not names of candidates for this opinion based discussion.

Entering Friday night, the election results are still being processed.  Quite incredible in today’s age of modern technology.  At the center of my crystal ball is the State of Nevada.  Also important is Arizona.  Note that Fox News, my preferred source of news, has Arizona already called for the Democrats, which I agree with.  You cannot win Arizona without winning Maricopa County, period, the end.  62% of Arizona’s voters reside in that county alone.  And Pima County historically always votes Democrat (county overall).  Pima County represents about 16% of Arizona’s voters.  If Maricopa and Pima both prefer the same party, at 78% of the State’s voters, the math simply does not work for the other party to out-climb the wall in front of him via votes from the rural areas.  The various late night cable shows that “Arizona is still in play”….in my opinion it is not.

This takes us to Nevada.  With 6 Electoral College votes, if the Democratic candidate wins here, he wins the election, because per Fox reporting he already has 264 out of the needed 270 votes.  He is already ahead in Nevada.  Nevada is interesting because nobody who lives there, is actually from there.  Well, almost nobody.  Nevada has more residents from California, than from Nevada.   Guess how California typically votes.

We also know that even in Red States, such as Texas, the “metro areas” voted more Democratic than they did Republican.  This did not occur in Oklahoma and other strongholds, but those metro areas indeed were “less red.”   In most all states, outlying rural areas voted Republican.  Hold that thought.   Let’s return to Nevada’s “still counting ballots” situation.  As of Thursday night, Nevada elections officials stated that there were about 190,000 ballots still to be counted as the state continues to remain too close to call in the U.S. presidential election.  About 90% of those remaining ballots, or about 171,000, are from Clark County.  Source:  https://twitter.com/NVElect/status/1324459947493519361?s=20

Clark County is the county that the city of Las Vegas sits in.   With 2M+ population, this is clearly a metro area and as stated above, already has demonstrated a leaning towards the Democratic Party, at 53.7% Democrat, 44.5% Republican as of Friday November 6. 

Short version:  90% of the yet counted ballots are from Clark County, a Democrat leaning county of metro area Las Vegas.  We have documented history reflecting strong Democrat leaning in most metro areas across USA.  Also, most residents of Nevada, are actually from California.  Summary:  My opinion is Nevada goes in favor of the Democrats.  If it does, game over.

Arizona:  already a done deal, per my commentary above.   Per news media, Clark County will finish ballot counting on Sunday (Nov 8), and Pima County will finish on Monday (Nov 9).   So it may be a long wait over the weekend.

Georgia:  Despite a Democrat very slight lead, I expect this to ultimately go in favor of the Republicans.  Going back to 1984, from the electoral college standpoint, Georgia has voted for Republicans, with the exception of 1992 when they voted for Clinton.   For my purposes, I believe Georgia ultimately will finish ballot counting and it will favor Republicans.

In conclusion, we may know something in the coming days.  It will be important to study how the markets respond, and react accordingly.

If you have not already done so, please participate in my reader poll:  https://www.quiz-maker.com/poll3070068x478E43f6-95

Everybody have a good weekend….

-Bill Pritchard