The Fed Trader

Hello everyone

Today’s Jan-28 stock market action resulted in the SP 500 index trading above yesterday’s range, and on (slightly) above average volume.   This is a positive development, and a desired change in the water temperature after multiple days of losses.  It closed above 1790, which is a level that I believe to be important, and closed at 1792.50.   The next level I am watching is 1806, as that is the 50-day Moving Average of the SP 500 index, any close above that, and we can all breathe somewhat easier.  In light of AAPL’s poor performance, the indexes displayed complimentary strength.  Overnight markets in Asia (open while America is closed) are trading positively, which is a good sign.

As most know, tonight was the State of the Union Address, and the discussion was basically about jobs (job creation, training, education) and energy (move automobiles to natural gas versus gasoline and discussed pro-solar energy stance).   My December 10 post discussed the importance of jobs, under Point #4.  Clearly the President’s economic team has advised him of the importance of jobs, and this announcement is not a surprise to me, as we also have the QE reduction in effect, and the FOMC meeting which concludes tomorrow, Wednesday.   So a few economic policy items are in motion and magically on the first State of the Union address of 2014, we hear about jobs.  No, I am not going to claim that I predicted this announcement regarding the importance of jobs, but you heard it discussed on The Fed Trader before our President mentioned it…

Moving forward, lets take a look at a snapshot of tonight’s intra-day SP 500 futures approximately ten minutes before the President began speaking.   As you can see, they ticked upward leading up to the speech:

Now, lets take a look at the same chart, at the end of the President’s speech:

What is clear is that the SP 500 futures went upward, an apparent positive response to the President’s speech.  Evening futures typically act as a preview to the upcoming daytime market trading’s behavior.

Summary:   Today’s stock markets traded up, and could have traded higher had they not been dragged down by AAPL.   State of Union address discussed many things but jobs appeared to be hot topic.   SP 500 futures, trading during evening, displayed positive reaction to the President’s speech.   Evening Asian markets are positive.  “Next goal” for SP 500 is close above 1806.

My TSP Allocation remains 50% S-Fund and 50% C-Fund.

– Bill Pritchard

Good Evening

I apologize for the chimes on your Blackberry as you receive this update, late at night, however I felt it was important to send this update out.   Please note, my TSP Allocation has not changed, yet.  With that said, today the SP 500 indeed penetrated downward thru the 1790 level, which was the low of the previous session, reflecting a continued downtrend of price action.   Fortunately, volume was lower than the prior trading day, which serves to temper my concerns, somewhat.  After hours, the Dow Futures and SP 500 futures were trading up, having found support and not trading below the day session’s lows as of 1AM Eastern Time.   See charts:

This act of resilience by the indexes provides me with some optimism that the markets will not go down without a fight, and I am not changing my current TSP Allocation (not yet). Observe my prior post, in which I discussed that perceived problems in Argentina and international markets have caused some panic selling by institutional investors.  In addition, it appears China is having some issues, combine this with the FOMC meeting this week, and the unknown statements on Tuesday’s State of the Union address, and it appears the markets are overly nervous.

NOT good, is that Apple Computer stock dropped 8% in after hours trading, due to disappointing sales and revenue outlooks.   This is a huge drop, as Apple is a large-cap stock, and a member of the NASDAQ 100.   You can fully expect that the market action on Jan 28 will be dragged down by AAPL.

No matter what happens this week, it will take a miracle to kick the month into a “positive month” in which we have a positive, and not a negative, percentage return.  With that said, if you subscribe to the January Barometer theory, as I do, the calendar year is not looking good for trading.   That may be reason alone to reduce exposure to stock funds and move partially to the G-Fund, as this is based on documented historical data, not hocus pocus or complicated economic theories.

Next up this week is the FOMC meeting, State of the Union address, and observing how the market absorbs the AAPL news.

My TSP Allocation remains 50% S-Fund and 50% C-Fund.

– Bill Pritchard

Good Evening

Last week was not pretty in the markets, US indexes and the international indexes witnessed severe losses on above average volume.  This is reflective of institutional selling, which is clearly a “red flag” and reason to moving the trigger finger closer to the G-Fund.   The sell-off in the markets appears to be attributed to financial problems in Argentina, in which inflation rates of over 30%, currency valuation issues, and low currency reserves, have prompted fears for international markets.   The worst performing markets last week were Argentina, France, and Germany.   Not surprisingly, the I-Fund was hit hardest last week, C-Fund next worse (#2 place on the worst list), and S-Fund being hit but escaping with the least damage.

Some fear that Argentina, running out of currency reserves (have we seen this show before?) , may default on current debt obligations, which will impact the lenders and impact credit ratings.  Seeing this, institutional investors likely got nervous and bailed out of other emerging and international markets.   The problems started Thursday, and continued into Friday.

My analysis of this, is that this was “panic selling” akin to when someone yells “Fire” in a movie theater.  Nobody is sticking around to analyze the fire, or how fast it is spreading.   People are just hitting the exits, and will look back once they get outside.   With that said, it is my opinion that institutional money bailed out on Thursday, and on Friday, they continued to hit the exits because they did not want any surprises over the weekend.  They could “rest easy” over the weekend, knowing that they had liquidated positions and were out.   Hopefully, on Monday Jan 27, people will reassess things and decide that Thursday and Friday were overreactions based on fear and not fact.   The following observations prompt me to believe that the US economy is back on track and things structurally are improving, home in the USA.  These are all available via google search, I have assembled some of them here:

1.  2013 home sales numbers higher than any year since 2006

2. Improving labor market evidenced by reduction in jobless claims data

3. Lower foreclosure rates (admittedly this may not mean anything, most foreclosures were related to 5-year ARM mortgages, and the peak of the housing cycle was approximately late 2007, more than 5 years ago.)  In other words, the “real estate boom foreclosure” cycle is behind us, if using the 5-year ARM as a reference point

4. Record new car sales numbers in 2013

5.  Record numbers of airline travelers, and airlines ordering record numbers of new airplanes, and hiring pilots.

6.  Gold prices in a downtrend, which began in late 2012.   “Safe haven” investment of gold loses favor in good economic climates as investors pull their money out of gold seeking better returns elsewhere, typically in stock markets.

7.  Corporate Earnings, Retail Sales data generally improved in 2013 over 2012.  I say generally because one needs to view this with a grain of salt.  “Sears reports poor earnings” or “Kmart has a bad year” does not necessarily mean that Joe Customer is broke / unemployed / bankrupt and therefore not shopping and stimulating things.  He is possibly one of many customers who are spending their dollars via Amazon.Com or at other stores, and saving gas and not having to park the car.  Just FYI when someone tells you that America is doomed because the local K-mart is empty.   Actually, America may be better off without having to step on gum in the parking lot, walking around a spilled Slurpee in the aisle, and old hot dogs spinning on the warmer, and two out of 10 cash registers staffed, all part of the “shopping experience” I have had myself.

Readers will recall my observations that the I-Fund was performing well in January, but I stated that I wanted to give things a little more time before making any decisions regarding the I-Fund, which (over the last few years) is hyper-sensitive to world political problems and economic concerns.   While we are on the subject of January, the January Barometer is not looking good right now.  Some may recall that this indicator predicts how the markets will perform for the rest of the calendar year, with an accuracy rate of 90%.    Lets take a look at the SP 500 Chart so far, from the start of January until present:

As can be seen, we are currently not “up” in January.   This concerns me, as the January Barometer is a highly accurate predictive indicator for the year to come.  We have five more days of trading left, Jan 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, and January is over, done, El Fin.   We need some miracles this upcoming week because that is what it will take to go from 1790.29 (Jan 24 close), and go above its highest close of 1848.38 (Jan 15), a which means that in one week the SP 500 has to gain 58 points.   Think of this as a football game, and as far as January is concerned, we are in the last quarter.   The markets have to regain some points if the January Barometer is used as a yardstick for the year.  1848 is the key level we are watching, for those CNN/CNBC ticker watchers.   1790 is the key low to watch, anything below that, and a cautionary move to G-Fund is almost obligatory.   Some of the “ride it out, it will come back” fans will surely email me (as they always do) but hey, I know what I am gonna do.   Control the bleeding and seek cover and concealment.

I have no additional charts or graphics this post, I wanted to mostly address what happened Thursday and Friday and provide my analysis.

For now, my TSP Allocation remains 50% S-Fund and 50% C-Fund.
However, I am very close to moving to G-Fund, which I hope does not occur, based on my opinions above regarding the US economy and the reasons the market sold off last week.  Hopefully, calmer minds surface next week and the markets recover.  At the end of the day, the market knows all, and opinion, speculation, theory, do not matter and we must respond to the market itself.    Let’s all be heads up next week as to how things play out.

Thank you for reading….

Bill Pritchard

I apologize….As a follow-up to my post 15 minutes ago, my TSP Allocation remains 50% S-Fund and 50% C-Fund.   BUT 100% S-Fund is fine also, that information should have come out that way in the first message but I hit “publish” too soon.   I need to stop multitasking and trying to send out blackberry PIN messages while I work on this site.

My TSP Allocation:  50% S-Fund and 50% C-Fund.

Good evening folks

Today, Jan 15, was a very good day in the markets, as was yesterday Jan 14.   Monday Jan 13 was pretty dismal, with a large sell off on above average volume.  Jan 13 was clearly a “red flag” day and not something we want to see occur often.  As can be expected, many naysayers and market bears came out taking credit for predicting the “coming crash” etc. nonsense, only to have things rebound the next day.   Aforementioned naysayers then disappeared back into the shadows.  The market continues to turn on a dime from one day to the next, so it is helpful to analyze things not only from a daily view, but zoom out to a weekly-monthly-quarterly view, to get a better snapshot of behavior.  For additional understanding of this, take a look at my March 1 2013 post, regarding “report cards.”

Volume on Jan 14 was above average, with the index closing up for the day, then on Jan 15, volume was even greater than Jan 14 volume, with another close up.   This behavior is consistent with institutional money flowing into stocks, such as money managed by mutual fund managers, hedge funds, retirement programs such as the TSP and state employee pension plans.   This is the money that moves markets and “primes the pump” for continued upward action, so it is critical that we monitor volume and price action in the markets.

With that said, on Jan 15, the SP 500 index (my default index for monitoring the health of the market) had a “Gap Up Day” in which the low price of Jan 15, 1840.25, was higher than the high price of the prior Jan 14 trading day, 1839.26.  This causes a “gap” to appear on the price chart.   This is a very bullish signal, and if the fundamental and economic factors are bullish (they are, things are recovering), this in almost all cases is a “buy signal” or at least a huge vote of confidence for bullish market conditions.    See charts below, one without comments, one with comments:

As a result of the prior two day’s action, my concerns which existed on Jan 13 have subsided to some extent, but not completely.   This is due to the “January Barometer”, a concept developed by Jeffrey Hirsch and discussed in his book The Almanac Investor, of which I have copy (now worn out). The January Barometer, with an accuracy rate of 90%, is an indicator in which every “down January” precedes the rest of the year going down, or flat, for stocks.  An “up January” precedes an up year.   Down or flat is not good, and so far this January has been mostly flat.   We are only two weeks into the month, so lets keep our fingers crossed.   The action on Jan 14 and Jan 15 may be what we need to light the firewood.

Regarding the TSP Funds, the S-Fund and I-Fund are the top performers right now, with the I-Fund outperforming all the other funds (so far) this month.   Before anyone is quick to pull the trigger on fund changes, my opinion is lets allow January to close out and then assess things.  My personal TSP Allocation remains 50% S-Fund and 50% C-Fund.  EDITED on 01-15-14 9PM  

Once again, “thank you” for all the great emails, and please continue to share this site with anyone who will benefit.

Thanks guys

Bill Pritchard

Just a quick message to wish everyone a Happy New Year, as in less than 48 hours, we will be welcoming in 2014, and saying goodbye to 2013.    A very brief recap of the past few days action reflect that a new high was made on the SP-500 on Dec 27, 2013, attaining 1844.89 on the index.

The last few days have been on low volume, however I am always receptive to new highs on indexes, low volume or not.   Also, the I-Fund has flashed some strength, and the top funds, performance-wise, have been I-Fund and S-Fund over the past five days.

Allow me to say THANK  YOU to all of my loyal subscribers, for the great comments and words of support regarding this site.    While I do not claim to have a crystal ball or be able to guarantee performance returns, if this site has stimulated some proactive TSP management, and improved some folks returns, than I have accomplished a lot.   This site has seen huge subscriber growth in 2013, and this is largely due to word of mouth from the subscriber base.  One of my wishes for 2014 is further growth of my subscriber base, and the only way to accomplish this is via me, delivering a quality product to the subscriber, who in turn will refer this site to others.

Everybody have a safe holiday…from my family to your family:  Happy New Year. 

– Bill Pritchard

This past week in the markets was very good, with the S-Fund outperforming all funds, and C-Fund taking second place.     There are no indications that this performance will change anytime soon.   As we enter Christmas week, trading will be light, as the U.S. securities markets will be closed at noon CT on Tuesday, Dec. 24, closed on Wednesday, Dec. 25 for Christmas and closed on Jan. 1 2014 for New Years.  I personally don’t see any huge market volume or activity coming back until Monday, January 6, 2014.   In other words, December’s action, for all intents and purposes, is “over.”

On Friday, Dec 20, the SP 500 index closed up on huge volume, hitting a new 52 week high of 1823.75.  See Chart:

As reported in my November 5, 2013 post, December is historically the best performing month out of the year, and while it got off to a rough start, I am quite pleased on how things have turned out (again, December is basically done now, trading-wise).   

It should be noted that on Sunday, Dec 22, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) made news by stating that it believes that the US economy is expanding faster than previously thought, and expressed a positive outlook for 2014.   This news was via statements by IMF Director Lagarde, and not in the form of an official press release/etc.   However, this has the potential of lifting the markets even further.   Readers will recall my prior hospital patient analogy, regarding the recovering US economy, and not shocking is the fact that we are starting to see independent reports and data confirm my prior statements.  I had the pleasure of eating breakfast recently with a Regional VP (for my geographic area) of a major US shipping company (I won’t name it but they paint everything one color).  This person reports directly to the HQ in USA.  Sometimes field interviews are much better than fancy reports, charts, and economic theories, and being on the street is where you see what is really happening.  I asked him “how did 2013 work out” and “are things coming back, from your point of view” and his response was overwhelmingly a “yes.”    

I have had some great reader mails, thank you, and a few have asked the legit question “is the market’s run is almost over.”   This is based on the observation that the SP-500 Index has been in an uptrend since basically 2009.   While true, it has only really taken off since November 2012.   I base my opinion, on two things, the use of the 200-day Moving Average as a trend signal, and the price of gold.   The financial industry typically views a penetration or “touching” of the 200-day MA as being a bearish signal, reflecting that the market/index is not fully healthy.   As my chart (with comments) below shows, not until 2013, did the index NOT touch the 200-day MA the entire year.   See chart:

In addition, I use the price of Gold as a secondary indicator (remember, the market itself is #1 indicator) as to how things are playing out.  Gold, is the “safe haven” for major market players in times of economic turmoil, war, or when fear is in the air.   Money is believed by some (me included) to be like fluids, and when fluid flows from one “container” (Gold, Bonds, Stocks, etc.) this means that it must flow to another container.   Students of fluid dynamics and system dynamics believe that one component of a system affects other components, similar to a heart which determines how fast your legs can run.  The heart may be more important than your leg muscle, and both need each other for a successful run.  With that said, many believe that money (fluid) leaves Gold when equities/stock markets are recovering, and further invests in stocks, thus sending them higher, and when stocks are doing bad, money goes elsewhere, to other investments such as Gold.  Gold is also important as it is the “default” currency, worldwide. 

The last major price peak of Gold occurred in October, 2012, and its price has been on a decline since, reflecting money outflows, and inflows into something else.  Note that since 2009 until October 2012, while the markets, yes, were up, Gold, also, was up, indicating that the world was not quite ready to dive head first into the stock markets.  In addition, 2009 up until Nov 2012, the SP 500 index had a couple of “rough patches” and violated the 200-day MA.    See Gold chart:

However this apparently changed in November 2012 (one month after the peak in Gold prices), as this was the start of a new uptrend in the SP 500 index, and in January 2013, after assessing the November and December behavior, and post-Fiscal Cliff resolution, I made the decision to return to the S-Fund.   Many of my readers have mirrored my TSP moves, and we all enjoyed a great 2013.   It is my opinion that the current bull market only “really” began in November 2012, and that 2014 is likely going to be a good year.

My TSP Allocation remains 50% S-Fund and 50% C-Fund.   I hope everyone has a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, and I will see everybody after the holidays.  Thanks

– Bill Pritchard

Hello folks

Well, to say that Dec 18 was a “good day” in the markets would be an understatement.   The FOMC released a statement, after having met on Dec 17 and 18, and said that they plan to start a very gradual tapering of QE in January of 2014.   Note that this is mostly in line with my Dec 10 update on this site, in which I stated that the FOMC would “take no action” on QE until 2014.   My opinion was somewhat correct, but not completely, as the “action” they took was the decision to start the taper.   However the actual taper will begin in 2014.   2013 will finish out unchanged and with no tapering activity.

The Dow Jones reacted with a gain of 292 points, and some sites (I have not personally done the math on it) reported that any and all losses in the markets in December, were reversed, in today’s strong action.   The SPY tracking stock, which mirrors the SP 500, traded 50% above its average volume, clearly a strong sign of credibility behind the move upward today.   This reflects that institutional money returned to the markets today, in large numbers.

The Washington Post published an opinion piece today, in which they basically repeated what I already told my subscribers in Point #4 of my December 10 post, regarding my position that the economy is indeed recovering.   Allow me to pat myself on the back and state that my subscribers received basically the same analysis eight days ago.

Small cap stocks (S-Fund) responded well, and outperformed everything else today, with large cap stocks (C-Fund), taking second place, and international stocks (I-Fund) taking third place, in daily performance.   This market reaction is in accordance with my existing TSP Allocation.  The TSP funds which gained the most, one-day, on Dec 18, were not the L-Funds, G-Fund, F-Fund, etc, but S-Fund, and C-Fund.   Readers may note that my personal TSP Allocation has been 50% S-Fund and 50% C-Fund.

Readers may recall my Sept 10 post, in which I stated that markets do not like uncertainty on important issues.   The reduction of QE, a federally driven program, and impacting world financial markets, is clearly in this category.  However for a large part of 2013, the markets have been handicapped by this fog of uncertainty, and in recent months, have displayed difficulty navigating higher thru this fog.   Not shockingly, when the FOMC made its position known today (with no taper action until 2014), the markets swallowed this like a hungry animal.   The modest taper (versus a more aggressive taper) likely contributed to this, which was basically the FOMC saying “We are tapering, but…”   Note that if the taper was more aggressive, my position remains that the market would have received this as negative news.   Instead, the FOMC decided it was time to leave the kiddie pool (ankle-deep) and move to knee-deep water.     In what appears to be a sound decision, the FOMC has decided that the diving-board deep side of the pool is not something the economy is ready for yet.

In other news, reports on new home construction reflect that in November 2013, more new homes have been built, that at any other time in the prior 5 years.   This added additional propellant to the rally.

I have no cool charts or graphics today, as my TDY internet wi-fi (thank you Residence Inn) is extremely slow.

In summary, today’s events are very positive and I am very optimistic for things in the near future.   Lets see how December finishes out.   Expect some naysayers to come out of the woodwork and some slight sell offs in the next few weeks.   However you don’t go up 292 points in one day, for no reason.     My current TSP Allocation remains 50% S-Fund and 50% C-Fund. 

Thanks for reading and talk to you soon…….Bill Pritchard

Hello folks

I am happy to report that so far this week (all two days of it), the SP 500 index has regained some of last week’s lost territory, and on December 9, came close to hitting its most recent 52-week high, 1813.55, which was hit on November 29.   The “1800 to 1810” area appears to be the most recent obstacle course, as anytime the index enters that territory, it gets dragged down and sent back lower.   My opinion is that if the index can clear and remain above 1810 for multiple sessions, this may open up the highway ahead for additional gains and new higher territory.

The market is likely concerned over the December 17-18 Federal Reserve meeting, in which (yet again) some believe a reduction of the QE program will be discussed or decided on.   Additionally, some nervousness existed regarding the lack of a budget deal, however this should be subsided going forward now that a budget deal was agreed to this evening, as reported by the Washington Post.  The article reports that the federal government is now funded thru the fall of 2015.  The article also reports that the two-year slide in federal spending is “reversed.”   

The SP-500 futures responded positively to this news, then traded flat for the remainder of the evening session.   Lets take a look at some charts to assess how the market is doing.   The first chart is “close only” chart, in other words, it shows only the closing level of the SP-500 index each day.  This is helpful to see thru the daily noise and volatility as the “close” is the point everybody went home at.  The next charts depict the normal daily trading, with the full day’s price activity displayed.   Observe that the first week of December reflected selling, based on lower closes and above average volume.   This is clearly not desired and is a “warning sign” that I look for, regarding possible new Bear markets / downtrends.  

Normal, unmarked SP-500 Chart, for review, prior to third chart, which is same chart but with my comments/annotations:

Same chart, with my comments/etc.

Please send me a reader e-mail if my charts are confusing or seem like voodoo. 

Observe that this week, volume has been less than average (so far), likely due to people staying on the sidelines in light of budget uncertainty (resolved this evening) and the Dec 17-18 Federal Reserve meeting.

Being that a reduction in QE will almost certainly impact the markets, in a negative manner (for how long, is not known), my “take” on this, is that the Federal Reserve will not take any action regarding the QE program during this meeting (they will likely address it early 2014), because:

1.  Congress is on Christmas break Dec-13 to Jan-7  2014.   I doubt any decisions (and subsequent announcements by FOMC) regarding a critical economic program will be announced by Obama/FOMC/etc. while Congress is out of the office.  Some of the members of the Senate and House banking/finance committees would likely desire to be cc’ed and/or participate in any such news announcements, and they will be on break.

2.  Any such news will be initially received as negative and a sell-off in the markets will likely occur.  The private citizen aka voter, who is making holiday preparations and putting up his Christmas tree, does not want his holiday period ruined.  As such, I doubt the FOMC will be looking to drop bombshells over the holidays.   NOTE:  The FOMC is not “elected” by voters, however any bad news will be attributed/associated to the political party/politicians in office.  The FOMC Chairman is nominated by the President.   

3.  And, 2013 has been a tough year, in the politics category.   Between sequestration, fiscal cliffs, furloughs, closed government offices, locked down National Parks, etc., the private citizen just doesn’t need yet another stick in his eye this year from Washington.    I am sure the Washington consensus is “lets get 2013 over with” and then this will be acted upon in 2014.

4. Any QE reduction announcements, when declared, will have some sort of economic stimulus or similar policy attached, to “soften” the blow to the markets.  Remember, QE reduction is because the economy is recovering.   And what does the voter care about ?  Jobs.   Employed people buy products, houses, make investments, and stimulate things.   Unemployed ones do not.   I anticipate some sort of new incentive regarding additional, further job creation or worker benefits to be announced when the QE reduction announcement is made.  This, in theory, will stimulate the economy even more, and help soften any hard drops the market may have on QE reduction news alone.  Also, the administration may be sitting on already existing good news or data and is waiting to “package it” with the QE announcement.

All funds are performing close to each other, and my personal TSP Allocation remains 50% S-Fund and 50% C-Fund. 

Thanks for reading, and please forward this update to your coworkers or colleagues that may find it interesting.    Thanks.

– Bill Pritchard

Hello folks

I hope everybody returned from the Thanksgiving holidays safely.   We are now into the month of December, and unfortunately the markets have started the month on a weak note, closing down on both Dec-2 (Monday) and Dec-3 (Tuesday).  Rudolf’s pleasant  jingle bells (does he have jingle bells ?) and Santa’s jolly laugh have failed to start.  Maybe it is too early yet.  Typically the first day of the month “sets the tone” for the rest of the month, so I am going to ask Santa to bring us some Holiday Cheer, if I can find him at the mall.

The SP 500 Index has departed the magical 1800 area, to the downside, and recent support is found at approximately the 1790 area.   In other words, any behavior below that is undesirable.  Today, Dec-3, the index displayed above average volume, while closing down, a “red flag” but not reason for total panic.   If we get multiple days like this in close proximity to each other, it may be a G-Fund Christmas instead of a white Christmas.   But lets standby for now and take a look at November’s TSP returns.  See image below:

As can be seen, the C-Fund (#1 monthly performer) out powered the S-Fund (#2 performer) in November.   However, YTD and Last 12 months, S-Fund is still the leader in performance.   Since October until present, C-Fund and S-Fund have been running close to each other, and my TSP Allocation is 50% S-Fund and 50% C-Fund at the present time.   I will advise anyone if this changes.  Out of ten fund choices, my system has put me into the top performer almost the entire year, and when not in the #1 performer, it was in the #2 performer.   So all year its been Walter Payton or Tony Dorsett.   Either one on your team and you are with a winner.    Note that I was in G-Fund for short bursts during the year, due some red flags (since proved false alarms) to my admitted fear of market crashes and account balance wipe-outs.  

Once again, I watch the market itself, for signals and red flags, and respond to those signals, and hesitate to speculate on reasons behind the moves.   With that standard disclaimer, it is my opinion that the fears of a reduction of the Quantitative Easing (QE) program are back in the air.

Also, the recent reports of Black Friday Sales being less than last year’s, have sent fear into the market.   Some Wall Street folks however might take note that while Black Friday was worse than last years, the folks who did not go to physical stores (Black Friday data is based on that) to shop, instead spent time on Amazon and other sites, ordering items.  One might observe that NetFlix basically put Blockbuster’s physical stores (and the company) out of business, when folks could stay home and save gas and avoid driving to Blockbuster only to find that their favorite movie was out of stock anyway.   Amazon (a few years ago it was mostly books) is credited with putting Borders Books out of business, and is presently giving my personal favorite hang-out spot, Barnes and Noble, a lot of heartburn.   Amazon (and other online retailers) are now challenging other old-school stores.   Unless you just want to get an Orange Julius or an Aunt Annie’s pretzel, why would anyone drive to the mall, burn gas ($4 a gallon), fight the crowds, park the car one mile away, only to find out that Grandma’s sweater size is not in stock.    I don’t.   Both last year and this year, I accomplished all of my Christmas shopping, to include physical gift wrapping, for my family and relatives, in multiple areas of USA, in one day, while in my pajamas.   Yes, that means it is December 3, and I am already done with shopping.  Any shipping costs (typically free if you order a minimal dollar amount) or sales tax that I had to pay more than offset the high PITA Factor (Pain In the A** Factor) involved with shopping for Christmas.  Note that most of the items were priced less than the same item in the actual physical stores.    I mean, I didn’t even have to get dressed, much less, leave the house.  Thank you Jeff Bezos.

With that said, ok, Black Friday’s numbers were low.   Is the world ending ?   Many “bears” on Wall Street would like to claim that.   We are all trained investigators, what do you think ?  

Lets take a look at the most recent SP 500 Chart (first image).   I realize we are only two trading days into December, but I wanted to post it anyway.   Observe that today the index closed lower (QE Fears and poor Black Friday / Aunt Annie numbers ?) on above average volume.    Which is undesirable.    Also, it is noteworthy that the evening SP 500 futures (white colored chart below) are trading up, and “found support” in the 1790 area, at least as of 9PM Central Time.   In other words, the low’s of the daytime session (which coincides with the daytime stock exchange session) were not violated, and the index is trading much improved during the evening session.    Charts/Images:

As a wrap-up, please FYI that Dan Jamison, of the FERS Guide, is retiring from federal law enforcement service after 21 years, effective Dec-4 2013.  Not surprisingly, he will utilize his extensive retirement planning knowledge in his retirement career.   Today, he released his most recent guide, which is posted under the FERS Guide link on this site.   Dan produced and authored all material himself.

Thank you for reading and if you find this site informative or useful, please share it with your friends and coworkers.     Thanks and talk to you soon.

– Bill Pritchard